|
Why
I made the t-shirt "Tom
Brokaw is Full of Shit"
[Yeah!
an essay! I love to read!]
In these days
of limited coverage by the mainstream media of corporate globalization
and of the unlimited war that the US Government has unleashed on
the world, the mainstream media must be exposed to all for what
it is: full of shit, full of lies and omissions, full of State Department
and Department of Defense press releases, full of interest in and
legitimization of the status quo (i.e. the existing high concentration
and centralization of wealth and power within and among "democratic"
societies, and ambitious programs to manifest even greater concentration
and centralization).
Don't forget
that media corporations are corporations (often huge conglomerate
for-profit corporations) and they behave as such. They are just
as interested in corporate welfare and favors from the government
(FCC regulation relaxation, anyone?) as Lockheed Martin! They might
want to throw the prez a slow pitch softball instead of a hard question...
that is if they want some of the goodies being handed out at Dubya's
party.
Don't forget
that NBC has bombs to sell. Or maybe you didn't realize that...
NBC's daddy GE got the WMD's baby! [General Electric, manufacturer
of nuclear weapons, is also the corporate parent of NBC. CBS's corporate
parent Westinghouse also makes nuclear weapons. Both also make nuclear
power plants.] Don't forget either that high paid media professionals
just might share the same class interests as other folks of high
socio-economic status. Don't forget there are three inch headlines
and exclusive coverage (and ad space for that coverage) to sell
during war.
It is time to
expose the mainstream media for what it is, and isn't. It is biased,
and it isn't in the least bit objective. It is owned by corporations
who take great interest in the information and the overall worldview
presented to the public. Thus, the mainstream media--including both
corporate and "public" (but corporately unwritten) outlets--cast
as and received by many as presenter of objective truth, is often
little more than a stealth arm of the public relations (or propaganda)
industry. Whereas the mainstream media heads like Tom Brokaw are
supposedly magically objective and gilded experts, in fact they
are not. Everyone is biased and to some degree guided by self interests.
These interests help decide which stories get covered in the infinite
sea of possible news stories, and further which facts and details
are exposed within each story that is reported... even which words
and idioms will be used to describe the selected facts and details.
I wasn't born
with knowledge of media bias, nor did I realize fully the condition
and extent of it until I was about twenty. Everyone hears from an
early age the modern maxim that you shouldn't believe everything
you see or hear on television and radio. The weight of the maxim
seems to lean towards recommending that most of what is on television
and radio is not to be believed. But, in reality many of us end
up believing quite a bit of what we are told by these sources of
information. This is quite natural. After all, we live in a complex
society. We could never hope to know everything about everything,
nor could we hope to know much about anything going on contemporarily
in our world if we didn't rely on sources of information other than
our own senses. Without such information we would be unable to make
important decisions in our lives.
There is a great
diversity among the sources of information available to us, ranging
from other people to large mainstream media outlets. Bearing in
mind the above mentioned maxim, it seems to me that many people
end up trusting what they see and hear on television and radio (as
well as what they read in printed mainstream news sources) more
than what they gather directly from other people (though this is
not across the board). Given the choice between information from
other people at street level and information from talking heads
on television news, for example, many will choose to believe the
latter due to a gap in perceived credibility. This gap results primarily
from the self promotion and fancy packaging that mainstream media
attach to their broadcasts (and other delivery methods), and the
lack of similar promotion and packaging on the part of the average
street level person. Additionally, there seems to be an unstated
assumption among many within the public that mainstream media outlets
would not possess their unique and oligarchical access to the broadcast
airwaves if they were not legitimate and credible. Monopoly and
oligarchy in actuality have nothing to do with legitimacy, except
that "legitimacy" generally sprouts from power -- power
being bolstered and expanded by the exclusive ownership and control
afforded by monopoly and oligarchy.
Over the course
of my life prior to becoming aware of the extent of media bias,
I engaged in much talking back to television and radio newscasts
in my living room and while driving in my car... calling in to radio
shows... emailing complaints to CNN and other outlets... as well
as having discussions with others about the content of news media
reporting... With the help of these unproductive attempts to participate
in and improve the quality of the mainstream media, as well as the
assistance of my undergraduate studies in political science at the
University of Minnesota, I finally did become aware of the endemic
and systematic biases in mainstream media.
As described
in my initial "Why I Make T-Shirts"
essay, in 2001 I decided to communicate political ideas and attempt
to help foment social change by making, wearing and distributing
t-shirts to be worn by others. I had three specific objectives in
mind when I designed this particular t-shirt, "Tom
Brokaw is Full of Shit." First, the design is intended
to call into question the credibility of the mainstream media. Second,
the design is intended to point to alternatives to the mainstream
media. Third, the design is intended to exhort people to become
more involved with the media: both directly, by actually becoming
the media by reporting news, and by being more media literate, or
skeptical of what media outlets report.
The first objective
is achieved by employing a highly provocative phrase, "...is
full of shit." This phrase is understood by almost every American
as a semi-comedic phrase that calls into question the credibility
of those it is directed against. It is not uncommon to hear someone
say, "Uncle Bill is full of shit," for example, to challenge
the veracity of what Uncle Bill has said. The accusation usually
has an air of poke-you-in-the-eye humorousness to it. This element
of humor adds to the effect of the shirt because it often causes
those who see it to laugh, whether they agree with the statement
or not. People often remember what they laugh at. Thus, making them
laugh at my message aids in people remembering my message (again
whether they agree with it or not). This is a major benefit, since
there is nothing to lose in having those who do not agree with the
statement remember it. The worst that can happen is that they may
continue to disagree. But, perhaps upon further consideration (made
possible by their remembering it) they may change their mind.
While initially
I was going to have the shirts say that "the corporate media
is full of shit," I decided against this because such a statement
is impersonal and abstracted. I instead pointed to a prominent personality
within the media, Tom Brokaw, feeling that doing so would make the
statement more concrete and meaningful. Choosing Tom Brokaw from
among the many other prominent personalities in the media may be
a bit of a subjective decision on my part. [Then again, more than
a year and half after I made this shirt, Brokaw did a lot toward
demonstrating his bias with his statement at the beginning of the
second US war against Iraq: "One of the things we don't want
to do is destroy the infrastructure in Iraq because in a few days
we're going to own that country."] I certainly could have made
my point using Dan Rather [who stated that he would "line up"
wherever President Bush wanted him to during a spot on the David
Letterman show shortly after 9/11] instead, for instance. The particular
personality that I chose is relatively unimportant. What is important
is that rather than making a statement about a generic entity, I
gave the statement a face, which again makes the accusation more
concrete, meaningful and memorable.
The second objective
of this t-shirt is achieved by the inclusion on its backside of
the URL for the Independent Media
Center (indymedia.org), an
open internet news source that allows anyone to participate in the
reporting of news. Independent media sources, such as the IMC, are
crucial alternatives to the mainstream media. I do not argue that
such independent media sources are inherently less biased than the
mainstream media. They are merely biased in a different way, including
facts and opinions omitted by mainstream media, and often omitting
facts and opinions found in the mainstream media. What I do argue
is that, in truly democratic societies, people need to get their
news from a variety of sources, then evaluate it themselves and
finally draw their own conclusions. In this way, society will more
resemble the proverbial "marketplace of ideas," in which
all ideas are freely available to people who must decide to which
ideas they will subscribe.
The second objective
of this t-shirt is particularly important because people cannot
benefit from alternative media--and society cannot benefit from
a marketplace of ideas--if they do not know that alternative media
exist or how to access them. Including the URL for the IMC both
announces the existence of alternative media and tells people where
to find it.
The third objective
of this t-shirt is achieved by the additional inclusion on its backside
of the statement "Become the media." The placement of
this statement under the URL for the IMC is appropriate for two
reasons. First, the IMC has used the slogan "Become the Media"
extensively. Secondly, the IMC is built upon the deconstruction
of the myth that media elites are somehow more qualified to report
the news than ordinary street-level people are. The IMC actively
encourages people to report the news using the simple instant publishing
interfaces found on the nearly two hundred different websites that
makeup the global IMC network, as well as by participating in affiliated
and non-affiliated print, radio, and video projects ("If you
can read, you can report," according to the IMC).
In conclusion
, this t-shirt design is a progression. First, it grabs attention
by calling into question the credibility of the mainstream media
by saying, "Tom Brokaw
is Full of Shit." Second, it points to an alternative media
source. Finally, it tells people to become involved with the media
rather than merely consuming it at face value.
View
or BUY this Shirt
|